<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mapos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://studiomapos.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://studiomapos.com</link>
	<description>Architects who calibrate design to culture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:58:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Penn Station is for Losers</title>
		<link>http://studiomapos.com/2012/02/08/penn-station-is-for-lovers/</link>
		<comments>http://studiomapos.com/2012/02/08/penn-station-is-for-lovers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mapos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penn station]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urbanism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studiomapos.com/?p=3664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2012/02/08/penn-station-is-for-lovers/"><img title="Penn Station is for Losers" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/penn-station.jpg" alt="Penn Station is for Losers" width="235" height="129" /></a></span><br/>For the record, I don't think New York (or it's taxpayers) should pay $3.2 billion for the new Moynihan station. In his recent piece, Michael Kimmelman outlines a handful of worthy alternatives to the horrible mess that is Penn Station. What his criticism points to - but doesn't directly address - is the perverse suggestion that we could ... <a href="http://studiomapos.com/2012/02/08/penn-station-is-for-lovers/">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2012/02/08/penn-station-is-for-lovers/"><img title="Penn Station is for Losers" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/penn-station.jpg" alt="Penn Station is for Losers" width="235" height="129" /></a></span><br/><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3665" title="Americans Begin Travel For Long Holiday Weekend" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/penn-station.jpg" alt="" width="738" height="406" />

For the record, I don't think New York (or it's taxpayers) should pay <a href="http://www.moynihanstation.org/newsite/2006/09/cost_funding_estimates.html">$3.2 billion</a> for the new Moynihan station. In his recent piece, Michael Kimmelman outlines a handful of worthy alternatives to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/12/arts/design/a-proposal-for-penn-station-and-madison-square-garden.html?hp">the horrible mess that is Penn Station</a>. What his criticism points to - but doesn't directly address - is the perverse suggestion that we could reverse our mistake of tearing down McKim, Mead &amp; White's original Penn Station by trying to renovate McKim, Mead &amp; White's adjacent Post Office into the new Penn Station. This bizarre logic is akin to buying an iTouch and calling it an iPhone. Just because they're both made by Apple doesn't make them perform the same way (even with renovations). And all train stations don't have to look like Grand Central, either. Add the fact that only 5% of Penn Station's current commuters would use the new station only solidifies the lunacy of this idea.

What this does point to is the growing need, maybe even the dawn of a new era, of infrastructural renovation, renewal, and adaptation. Our cities are of full of bridges, tunnels, stations, wharves, highways, and sewers that were built 100 to 50 years ago and need some attention. Beyond mere repair, there is a real opportunity to look at these physical developments as places of civic pride. What could the Gowanus Expressway look like if we capitalize on the volume of space it creates underneath it? What could the Red Hook Terminal become if we recognize its prime waterfront location? What could Penn Station signify if we don't try to recreate the past but build for the future?

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://studiomapos.com/2012/02/08/penn-station-is-for-lovers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Other Guy Had a Point (Maybe)</title>
		<link>http://studiomapos.com/2012/02/08/you-may-not-agree-but-the-other-guy-had-a-point-maybe/</link>
		<comments>http://studiomapos.com/2012/02/08/you-may-not-agree-but-the-other-guy-had-a-point-maybe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mapos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suburbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urbanism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studiomapos.com/?p=3658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2012/02/08/you-may-not-agree-but-the-other-guy-had-a-point-maybe/"><img title="The Other Guy Had a Point (Maybe)" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/IMGP9230-550x412.jpg" alt="The Other Guy Had a Point (Maybe)" width="235" height="176" /></a></span><br/>I wonder where my skepticism comes from. Being a fan of urban density and everything that comes with it - cultural diversity and abundance, housing density, energy efficient living, mass transit, walking and biking as healthy alternatives to car commuting, the list goes on - I sometimes feel that the anti-suburb conversation is swinging the ... <a href="http://studiomapos.com/2012/02/08/you-may-not-agree-but-the-other-guy-had-a-point-maybe/">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2012/02/08/you-may-not-agree-but-the-other-guy-had-a-point-maybe/"><img title="The Other Guy Had a Point (Maybe)" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/IMGP9230-550x412.jpg" alt="The Other Guy Had a Point (Maybe)" width="235" height="176" /></a></span><br/><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-3660" title="IMGP9230" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/IMGP9230-550x412.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="412" />

I wonder where my skepticism comes from. Being a fan of urban density and everything that comes with it - cultural diversity and abundance, housing density, energy efficient living, mass transit, walking and biking as healthy alternatives to car commuting, the list goes on - I sometimes feel that the anti-suburb conversation is swinging the pendulum too far in the other direction (and let's be truthful, a lot of suburbs are beautiful desirable places to live).

To move the conversation in the right direction, we need a balanced look at history. What were the planners at the time thinking about when they put pen to paper and dreamed up their bucolic garden communities on the edge of cities? Some of them had to be intelligent people, after all, so let's not throw the tomato plants out with the lawn shavings.

Suburban sprawl - and especially the far-flung exurbs - HAS proven itself to be an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/26/opinion/the-death-of-the-fringe-suburb.html?src=tp&amp;smid=fb-share">unsustainable development</a>, as Christopher Leinberger writes in the NY Times, but is it completely broken as to say that it is in "collapse"? Or that the fringe suburbs have achieved an untimely "death." When I was right out of college, I knew many Midwestern peers who wanted exactly what they had growing up and never considered the "lifestyle reasons and the convenience of not having to own cars." And as I've often said, when I retire (if I ever do), I want to live in an elevator building in New York City for the exact reasons Leinberger mentions in his piece. But I'm also not that naive to believe that every "boomer wants to live in a walkable urban downtown." In fact, I know many who like their suburban manse, thank you very much. To generate profound and lasting change in our development patterns, I think we should look at why a lot of people are making the lifestyle decisions they do. What made the suburbs so successful and so desired in the first place? And while we're at it, let's not forget that urbanism preceded suburbanism, and was itself was preceded by agrarianism. We've been here before, haven't we?

In another piece in the Times, Louise Mozingo <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/26/opinion/to-rethink-sprawl-start-with-offices.html?src=tp&amp;smid=fb-share">puts suburban office developments in her sites</a>. At least she describes why the landscaped corporate parks were so popular. But again, to simply say that corporations should move back to the city or tie their suburban campuses to mass transit (which are great ideas) misses the point. I'm not about to write a treatise on human habit development over the centuries, but a realistic look at human behavior and WHY some of us - MOST of us - used to really like the suburbs would be a good idea.

And before I get too far with this line of thought, let me repeat myself: I like the city and want to live in one. Always. Humans are complex things, however, and we're never going to agree on everything, especially when we swing the pendulum too far out of reach.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://studiomapos.com/2012/02/08/you-may-not-agree-but-the-other-guy-had-a-point-maybe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Big Duh</title>
		<link>http://studiomapos.com/2012/02/06/the-big-duh/</link>
		<comments>http://studiomapos.com/2012/02/06/the-big-duh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 01:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://studiomapos.com/?p=3653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2012/02/06/the-big-duh/"><img title="The Big Duh" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/dead-mall.jpg" alt="The Big Duh" width="235" height="156" /></a></span><br/>The elephant is in the room and we all know it. This excellent piece shines a light on the decaying and empty shopping centers that are littering the suburbs of the U.S. They’re huge. Their parking lots are huger. The “power centers” where they are built play big in people’s daily lives. They’re inefficient, destroy ... <a href="http://studiomapos.com/2012/02/06/the-big-duh/">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2012/02/06/the-big-duh/"><img title="The Big Duh" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/dead-mall.jpg" alt="The Big Duh" width="235" height="156" /></a></span><br/><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3654" title="dead mall" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/dead-mall.jpg" alt="" width="738" height="492" />

The elephant is in the room and we all know it. This <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/06/business/making-over-the-mall-in-rough-economic-times.html?pagewanted=1">excellent piece shines a light on the decaying and empty shopping centers</a> that are littering the suburbs of the U.S. They’re huge. Their parking lots are huger. The “power centers” where they are built play big in people’s daily lives. They’re inefficient, destroy greenfields, and aren't that beautiful to boot. Small towns have fell victim to their construction (as they win out over Main street) and often struggle for survival when they eventually die themselves.

What can we do about them? How can we leverage the energy (and money and materials) already spent on their development? What does their second life hold? Community centers? Schools? Housing? Mixed-use? Suburban agriculture?

At the same time, why were they built in the first place? While most are copy-cat developments with little thought to the long term, some are products of very smart people actually putting a lot of thought into their creation. What are their assets? (easy construction, ease of access, easy parking, great for mass retailing) What could greatly improve the relationship between people and planet (connections to mass transit, parking as landscape, connection to the outdoors, skylights, recycled materials, creative fixture design).

With over 100,000 shopping centers in the U.S. - and many of them dead or dying - these seem like good questions to ask.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://studiomapos.com/2012/02/06/the-big-duh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum</title>
		<link>http://studiomapos.com/2011/12/02/a-funny-thing-happened-on-the-way-to-the-forum/</link>
		<comments>http://studiomapos.com/2011/12/02/a-funny-thing-happened-on-the-way-to-the-forum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 17:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mapos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spamos.wordpress.com/?p=851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/12/02/a-funny-thing-happened-on-the-way-to-the-forum/"><img title="A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/public-space1.jpg" alt="A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum" width="235" height="149" /></a></span><br/>While most people have been generally obsessed for the past 15 years with buildings and the starchitects behind them, the "public realm," for lack of a better term, went into hibernation. Now, with the economy stalled and the amount of new buildings - and their architects - stalled, the forums of our cities are getting ... <a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/12/02/a-funny-thing-happened-on-the-way-to-the-forum/">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/12/02/a-funny-thing-happened-on-the-way-to-the-forum/"><img title="A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/public-space1.jpg" alt="A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum" width="235" height="149" /></a></span><br/><h2><img class="size-full wp-image aligncenter" title="Mapos-Spamos-A-Funny-Thing-Happend-On-The-Way-To-The-Forum" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/public-space1.jpg" alt="" width="578" height="366" /></h2>
<h6>While most people have been generally obsessed for the past 15 years with buildings and the starchitects behind them, the "public realm," for lack of a better term, went into hibernation. Now, with the economy stalled and the amount of new buildings - and their architects - stalled, the forums of our cities are getting some much deserved attention. Hey, we're architects and we support the construction of new and renovated buildings as a matter of livelihood, but that has not ceased our intense interest in the care and development of successful urban places where these buildings live and where people move and breathe between buildings. Where we can stand back and look. And talk. And eat. And play. If our cities were just buildings, we'd be living on the Death Star. The buildings may define a city by it's skyline, but it's the public spaces between buildings that define a city by it's people, their culture, and how they inhabit and move through it.</h6>
<h6>"We’ve been so fixated on fancy new buildings that we’ve lost sight of the spaces they occupy and we share," Michael Kimmelman says in <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/arts/design/alexander-garvin-looks-at-public-spaces-in-new-york.html?hp" target="_blank">his report on New York's amazing public spaces</a>. He spent an afternoon walking through some of New York's famous - and infamous - public spaces with the urban planner and architect Alexander Garvin. <a href="http://spamos.wordpress.com/2011/04/21/mapos-guide-to-new-york/" target="_blank">Earlier this year I took a class of NYU students on a very similar walking tour</a>. The point of both walks was to point out the canvas that our building icons sit upon. How do buildings hit the streets? How do the spaces around them support human movement, transportation, relaxation, urban enjoyment? I argued on my walk that most buildings do a rather poor job of transitioning to the sidewalk. They look great from a distance and from aerial photographs - the postcard shots - but often fail at negotiating the all too important human scale at the ground. The Seagram building is seminal architecture, to be sure. The plaza in front (and on the sides) has much to be desired.</h6>
<h6>Call it "ground up" architecture instead of "trickle down." Kimmelman writes about how the Dutch begin their urban design projects thinking about granular aspects like subway entrances, bike paths, crosswalks, and storefronts before handing off building sites to architects. here in the States it's most often the reverse. The developers design their buildings, and the public realm has to adapt to what is given them. I am always struck in Europe with the prevalence of "square," or, "plaza, piazza, place, ter, trg, torg, plein, platz," or any number of translations that make open space in the city so loved and respected. It's hip to be square.</h6>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://studiomapos.com/2011/12/02/a-funny-thing-happened-on-the-way-to-the-forum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Mapos Internship Program</title>
		<link>http://studiomapos.com/2011/11/16/new-mapos-internship/</link>
		<comments>http://studiomapos.com/2011/11/16/new-mapos-internship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 17:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mapos intern]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spamos.wordpress.com/?p=845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/11/16/new-mapos-internship/"><img title="New Mapos Internship Program" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/the-big-lebowski-and-brandt.jpg" alt="New Mapos Internship Program" width="235" height="176" /></a></span><br/>&#160; We at Mapos are thrilled to announce the initiation of the new Mapos Internship Trimester! This internship initiative will be an ongoing program wherein we will take on one or two interns in tours of 3-4 months each. This may be part time or full time and will vary in tenure length, depending upon the ... <a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/11/16/new-mapos-internship/">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/11/16/new-mapos-internship/"><img title="New Mapos Internship Program" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/the-big-lebowski-and-brandt.jpg" alt="New Mapos Internship Program" width="235" height="176" /></a></span><br/><p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-846" title="Mapos-Spamos-New-Mapos-Internship-Program" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/the-big-lebowski-and-brandt.jpg" alt="" width="490" height="367" /></p>
&nbsp;
<h6>We at Mapos are thrilled to announce the initiation of the new Mapos Internship Trimester! This internship initiative will be an ongoing program wherein we will take on one or two interns in tours of 3-4 months each. This may be part time or full time and will vary in tenure length, depending upon the availability of the candidates.</h6>
<h6>Here at “World Domination Headquarters” (a.k.a. Mapos) on the Bowery, you will not be chained to your desk and forced to generate mind-numbing CAD details for a pittance like your fellow interns in corporate firms. Rather, you will be faced with a series of mind-bending mental and physical challenges for a pittance. These challenges will range from designing our office space, light construction, helping to concept new ideas for the city, researching and collecting cutting edge materials, working with live animals (some completely feral), and entertaining the staff and partners, among many other things. There will also be ice cream and lots and lots of Kool-Aid<sup>TM</sup>!</h6>
<h6>After working here, you can expect to walk away with the following:</h6>
<ul>
	<li>
<h6>A fun and amazing, hands-on experience in your field of study</h6>
</li>
	<li>
<h6>An unfiltered, first-hand view of how to run a small and growing design studio</h6>
</li>
	<li>
<h6>At least a couple amazing projects for your professional portfolio</h6>
</li>
	<li>
<h6>The possibility of built work</h6>
</li>
	<li>
<h6>Excellent references…</h6>
</li>
<ul>
	<li>
<h6>If you are good</h6>
</li>
	<li>
<h6>Our recommendations have resulted in jobs at Shop, Avroko, Studio Daniel Libeskind, Pompei AD, and Peter Marino Assoc.</h6>
</li>
</ul>
	<li>
<h6>The possibility of working at Mapos upon graduation…</h6>
</li>
<ul>
	<li>
<h6>If you are awesome</h6>
</li>
	<li>
<h6>All of our full time employees were former interns here</h6>
</li>
</ul>
</ul>
<h6>You must have strong skills in:</h6>
<ul>
	<li>
<h6>AutoCad</h6>
</li>
	<li>
<h6>Sketchup</h6>
</li>
	<li>
<h6>Adobe CS</h6>
</li>
	<li>
<h6>WordPress</h6>
</li>
	<li>
<h6>General computer skills</h6>
</li>
</ul>
<h6>These traits would also preferred:</h6>
<ul>
	<li>
<h6>A fearlessness in the face of challenges</h6>
</li>
	<li>
<h6>A proactive, “can do” spirit</h6>
</li>
	<li>
<h6>A willingness to get one’s hands dirty</h6>
</li>
	<li>
<h6>A sense of humor</h6>
</li>
	<li>
<h6> An “Eye of the Tiger,” by Survivor</h6>
</li>
	<li>
<h6>Reliability, reliability, and reliability</h6>
</li>
</ul>
<h6>Note that this is an unpaid internship, but will include a base lunch stipend to be paid 50% at the beginning and 50% upon completion of the program.</h6>
<h6>If interested, email a brief cover letter, resume, and work samples in PDF format to info@studiomapos.com. Please indicate your availability (start date, end date, weekly hours) in your cover letter. NO PHONECALLS.</h6>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://studiomapos.com/2011/11/16/new-mapos-internship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saturday in the Bronx</title>
		<link>http://studiomapos.com/2011/11/08/bronx-rvier-1/</link>
		<comments>http://studiomapos.com/2011/11/08/bronx-rvier-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bronx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mapos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newyork]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spamos.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/bronx-rvier-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/11/08/bronx-rvier-1/"><img title="Saturday in the Bronx" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/bronx-river-41.jpg" alt="Saturday in the Bronx" width="235" height="55" /></a></span><br/><a href="http://spamos.wordpress.com/2011/11/08/bronx-rvier-1/"><img src="http://spamos.wordpress.com/files/2011/11/bronx-rvier-1.jpg" alt="bronx rvier 1" class="size-full wp-image-837" /></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/11/08/bronx-rvier-1/"><img title="Saturday in the Bronx" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/bronx-river-41.jpg" alt="Saturday in the Bronx" width="235" height="55" /></a></span><br/>&nbsp;
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-843 aligncenter" title="Mapos-Spamos-Saturday-In-The-Bronx" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/bronx-river-41.jpg" alt="" width="490" height="116" /></p>
&nbsp;
<h6 style="text-align: left;">This past Saturday, I joined a small crew at <a href="http://rockingtheboat.org/">Rocking the Boat</a> in the Bronx, an amazing organization that works with local teenagers and teaches them how to build boats. After a quick tour of their workshop, some of the kids joined us as we paddled their creations on the adjacent Bronx River and where, I believe, was the true power of the organization. Learning how to build boats teaches the kids craftmanship, team work, and those intangible skills that any focused pursuit can give to young people. Out on the river, the boats opened up whole new worlds to normally landlocked urbanites: water issues, ecology, wildlife, the environment, community context, social responsibility. The students at Rocking the Boat were born in the Bronx. Now they are studying the river ecology and restoring wetlands with their neighbors. They are camping in the Catskills and taking Outward Bound classes in the Sierra Nevada. They're getting scholarships and going to college. A couple of oars can take you way past the Whitestone Bridge.</h6>
&nbsp;

&nbsp;]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://studiomapos.com/2011/11/08/bronx-rvier-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Official Behavior</title>
		<link>http://studiomapos.com/2011/08/23/memo-to-steve-jobs-help-me-make-a-better-calendar/</link>
		<comments>http://studiomapos.com/2011/08/23/memo-to-steve-jobs-help-me-make-a-better-calendar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spamos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arieff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mapos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workspace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spamos.wordpress.com/?p=827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/08/23/memo-to-steve-jobs-help-me-make-a-better-calendar/"><img title="Official Behavior" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/arieff_cubicle5-blog427.jpg" alt="Official Behavior" width="235" height="211" /></a></span><br/>I just stumbled upon another interesting article in the NYTimes by Allison Arieff. Writing over a month ago, she looks at the persistent yet optimistic theory that design can solve the "problems" in the workplace. One of my "problems" is I'm just reading this now. My busy work life, my much needed personal life, and ... <a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/08/23/memo-to-steve-jobs-help-me-make-a-better-calendar/">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/08/23/memo-to-steve-jobs-help-me-make-a-better-calendar/"><img title="Official Behavior" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/arieff_cubicle5-blog427.jpg" alt="Official Behavior" width="235" height="211" /></a></span><br/><p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-828" title="Mapos-Spamos-Official-Behavior" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/arieff_cubicle5-blog427.jpg" alt="" width="427" height="385" /></p>
I just stumbled upon another interesting article in the NYTimes by Allison Arieff. Writing over a month ago, she looks at the <a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/18/beyond-the-cubicle/">persistent yet optimistic theory that design can solve the "problems" in the workplace</a>. One of my "problems" is I'm just reading this now. My busy work life, my much needed personal life, and my odd day-offs over the summer, have not left much room for catching up with current events and the popular press. I can decry the fact that I spend time staring at my iPhone on my days off, but the fact of the matter is that my iPhone allows me to take days off, because I can use it to answer emails remotely. This multi-tasking-life-work-integration-collaboration is sweeping the professional world, and I guess I'm part of it.

But is this a "problem"? As Arieff points out, and we all intuitively know, more and more of us are working in more and more unconventional fashion. Throw in the unstable economy, and you've got a generation of workers working in a non-work-like atmosphere. At home. On the road. In the car. On the sidewalk. Off of a tablet. In other words, not at a desk in an office.
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-829" title="Arieff-HUB-SOMA-img-blog427" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/arieff-hub-soma-img-blog427.jpg" alt="" width="427" height="284" /></p>
So while designers and contract furniture makers try to re-design the cubicle and make the office a more creative atmosphere, the larger issue continues unabated and often ignored: we continue to work in erratic ways and erratic locations. We continue to live and work in more flexible ways, juggling life and family and work in one great creative act. Our lifetyle, not our office or our mobile tools, is the primary driver dictating this schizophrenic behavior. So the solution won't be better desk or a smarter office, but a clear and honest understanding of how we want to be.

(Working in the "green" world, we have become keenly aware that the answer to climate change is not some new technology. Motion sensors, PV panels, heat-transfer systems, are all great at reducing green house gas emissions. But to truly get us on a path to energy intelligence we have to honestly look at how our behavior can affect energy use and change the way we live. It's a nice day today. And we just got another obscene electricity bill in the mail. Today we turned off the ACs and opened the windows. Simple and effective.)

The related question, of course, is our varied lifestyle conducive to being productive? <a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/22/its-not-about-the-furniture-cubicles-continued/">While each of us exhibits our individual creativity, very few jobs get accomplished in solitude.</a> Work spaces need places for conversation, team work, and the freedom to collaborate and ideate. But does too much freedom lead to chaos? While a desk can be confining, I find it helps me focus and deliver. Personally, I could not do my job effectively if I were constantly on the run and dialing in from coffee shops. While I could use a better desk. What I really need is a better calendar.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://studiomapos.com/2011/08/23/memo-to-steve-jobs-help-me-make-a-better-calendar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better than Nothing</title>
		<link>http://studiomapos.com/2011/08/08/better-than-nothing/</link>
		<comments>http://studiomapos.com/2011/08/08/better-than-nothing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 15:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spamos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mapos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban farming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spamos.wordpress.com/?p=824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/08/08/better-than-nothing/"><img title="Better than Nothing" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/detroit-farm.jpg" alt="Better than Nothing" width="235" height="142" /></a></span><br/>It's encouraging to hear that "productive conversations" between a farming initiative and Detroit bureaucrats are happening. Mapos sincerely hopes that this is genuine and not just wishful thinking. If there is something Detroit does not need is another hollow reason to get their hopes up. My Detroiter brother sent this link that outlines these conversations as well ... <a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/08/08/better-than-nothing/">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/08/08/better-than-nothing/"><img title="Better than Nothing" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/detroit-farm.jpg" alt="Better than Nothing" width="235" height="142" /></a></span><br/><p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-825" title="Mapos-Spamos-Better-Than-Nothing-Detroit-Farm" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/Web/Images/detroit-farm.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="182" /></p>
It's encouraging to hear that "productive conversations" between a farming initiative and Detroit bureaucrats are happening. Mapos sincerely hopes that this is genuine and not just wishful thinking. If there is something Detroit does not need is another hollow reason to get their hopes up.

My Detroiter brother sent this <a href="http://www.freep.com/article/201108080300/BUSINESS04/108080324">link that outlines these conversations as well as the pros and cons of building a substantial commercial farm within city limits</a>. As with any urban "project," the concerns are real and should not be discredited: an increase in truck traffic in residential areas or a conflict with existing agricultural businesses in Michigan that rightly need support for their own continued existence. What should not happen is to let a very good idea die because it is difficult to implement or simply because it is not business-as-usual. I do not think urban agriculture will cure Detroit's ills. At least not alone. What is certain, however, is that business-as-usual will not.

"I think it's better to generate some tax revenue from somebody," says a local zoning attorney. Take a cue from New York, where Mayor Bloomberg readily tries new programs by couching them as prototypes and urban experiments so he can circumvent lengthy bureaucratic approval processes. If they don't work, shutter the program and move on and chalk it up to a valiant effort that didn't pan out. Something, anything, is better than nothing.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://studiomapos.com/2011/08/08/better-than-nothing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cars need People too (but we love less cars)</title>
		<link>http://studiomapos.com/2011/06/27/818/</link>
		<comments>http://studiomapos.com/2011/06/27/818/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spamos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mapos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zurich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spamos.wordpress.com/?p=818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/06/27/818/"><img title="Cars need People too (but we love less cars)" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/uploads/zurich.jpg" alt="Cars need People too (but we love less cars)" width="235" height="159" /></a></span><br/>Mapos is all about better, smarter, more sustainable design strategies for our cities (and buildings, and homes, and parks....) What is happening in Europe is a fabulous example of more pedestrian friendly cities. As the author of this recent NYTimes article points out, businesses in car-restricted districts actually thrive with more pedestrian access, countering the ... <a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/06/27/818/">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/06/27/818/"><img title="Cars need People too (but we love less cars)" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/uploads/zurich.jpg" alt="Cars need People too (but we love less cars)" width="235" height="159" /></a></span><br/><p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-820" title="Mapos-Spamos-Cars-Need-People-Too-Zurich-Bikers" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/uploads/zurich.jpg" alt="" width="490" height="333" /></p>
Mapos is all about better, smarter, more sustainable design strategies for our cities (and buildings, and homes, and parks....) What is happening in Europe is a fabulous example of more pedestrian friendly cities. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/27/science/earth/27traffic.html">As the author of this recent NYTimes article points out</a>, businesses in car-restricted districts actually thrive with more pedestrian access, countering the long held argument by car-first advocates that businesses will suffer. All good stuff. We would be remiss, however, if we did not point out a strange oversight in the logic of the non-car set. they promote "people over cars" but seem to forget that people are driving those cars. Alternatives do exist. This is a model to celebrate. But let's not dismiss a viable and sometimes necessary transportation alternative for many people.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://studiomapos.com/2011/06/27/818/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lights, Camera, Mapos!</title>
		<link>http://studiomapos.com/2011/06/22/lights-camera-mapos/</link>
		<comments>http://studiomapos.com/2011/06/22/lights-camera-mapos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>spamos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mapos Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Project Visit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGHB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Callahan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LXTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mapos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montagnaro House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Openhouse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spamos.wordpress.com/?p=812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/06/22/lights-camera-mapos/"><img title="Lights, Camera, Mapos!" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/uploads/ghent-nbc.jpg" alt="Lights, Camera, Mapos!" width="235" height="154" /></a></span><br/>Be sure to check out the first of 4 episodes on NBC's Open House featuring the construction progress of the Montagnaro House. In this episode, Glenn Callahan and David Jackson of American Green Home Builders touch upon some green design strategies that everyone should consider when building a new home. Hats off to the greenest ... <a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/06/22/lights-camera-mapos/">Continue Reading</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span class="image-rss"><a href="http://studiomapos.com/2011/06/22/lights-camera-mapos/"><img title="Lights, Camera, Mapos!" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/uploads/ghent-nbc.jpg" alt="Lights, Camera, Mapos!" width="235" height="154" /></a></span><br/><p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-813" title="Mapos-Spamos-Ghent-House-NBC" src="http://studiomapos.com/wp-content/uploads/ghent-nbc.jpg" alt="" width="490" height="321" />Be sure to check out the first of 4 episodes on <a href="http://www.nbcnewyork.com/blogs/open-house/OHNY_-_AGHB_New_York-124085689.html" target="_blank">NBC's Open House</a> featuring the construction progress of the Montagnaro House. In this episode, Glenn Callahan and David Jackson of American Green Home Builders touch upon some green design strategies that everyone should consider when building a new home. Hats off to the greenest and most camera-ready GC team out there!</p>
Be on the lookout for Mapos in a forthcoming episode dedicated to smart water management!]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://studiomapos.com/2011/06/22/lights-camera-mapos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

